Wednesday, October 2, 2013

The paradoxical poetry of Fascism
Page 38 passage- Raymond Lu

Within the passage, Mulisch compares light and darkness to elucidate the paradoxical relationship between the Rebels and Fascists. Mulisch tackles this seemingly insurmountable obstacle by writing, "Hate is darkness...no good. And yet we've got to hate the Fascists...we hate them in the name of light...We hate hate itself...our hate is better"(38). Mulisch suggests that hate is justified when it is done in the name of light; he asserts that sin is acceptable when done for a noble cause, "we hate in the name of light". The author warns, however, that one must take the higher road, else he or she may become no better than the enemy; such is the danger that occurs when one "hates in the name of love". In spite of this, the narrator still concedes that one must," become a little bit like them in order to fight them--so we become a little bit unlike ourselves"(38). Thus, a paradox is created: it is good to hate Fascism, and bad to be a fascist, yet through the development of one's hate, one becomes a fascist. In other words, one must be willing to hate what one will become. Mulisch also uses particular syntactical structures to emphasize the tone of the passage- passionate, filled with conviction. In particular, Mulisch writes, " How is that possible? It's because we hate them...our hate is better"(38). The rhetorical question is used to demonstrate the woman's faith in belief the rebellion cause, as the doubt created is immediately repudiated- there is no hesitation or uncertainty. This tone is antonymous to that of the previous paragraph, wherein which the narrator constantly contradicts herself, " Light, yes, but light is not...I mean...no, I mean...You could...Maybe"(38). Thus, Mulisch's use of specific metaphors and syntactical structures furthers the reader's understanding of the passage.

7 comments:

  1. Great writing and great ideas, but you should have a conclusion that does not end your post so awkwardly.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Great writing and great ideas, but you should have a conclusion that does not end your post so awkwardly.

    ReplyDelete
  3. In addition, this sentence, "The rhetorical question is used to reinforce her belief towards the rebellion cause; the doubt created is dispelled immediately by her unwavering faith- there is no hesitation or stuttering, which she had earlier in the novel." seems a little run-on. Just make it 2 or 3 different sentences.

    ReplyDelete
  4. In addition, this sentence, "The rhetorical question is used to reinforce her belief towards the rebellion cause; the doubt created is dispelled immediately by her unwavering faith- there is no hesitation or stuttering, which she had earlier in the novel." seems a little run-on. Just make it 2 or 3 different sentences.

    ReplyDelete
  5. In addition, this sentence, "The rhetorical question is used to reinforce her belief towards the rebellion cause; the doubt created is dispelled immediately by her unwavering faith- there is no hesitation or stuttering, which she had earlier in the novel." seems a little run-on. Just make it 2 or 3 different sentences.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Just put a period after faith, and you will be good to go. I think the reason Armaan noticed its length is that you use passive voice: "The rhetorical question is used" rather than "The woman uses a rhetorical question to reinforce..."

    ReplyDelete
  7. PS: Why did Armaan need to post each comment twice? ...

    ReplyDelete