Mulisch explores
a concept of justified hatred and demonstrates the irony of such a statement
with the juxtaposition of light with love and dark with hate as well as the
inverse effect of blurring of the traditional negative connotations of hatred
and positive ones of love. The woman
wants to “compare love to the kind of light that you sometimes see clinging to
trees right after a sunset”. Thus she
implies a majestic or “magical’ quality to this light, this love of which she
speaks.
Yet, in a
contradictory statement, she advocates the necessity to “hate the fascists” which she justifies on the basis that “we
hate them in the name of light” and that “our hate is better than theirs.” This statement exposes a contradiction within her overall message. She advocates love like a light which is “magical” in its
brilliance yet asserts that it must be fought for with hate, the very darkness
against which this light rebels.
The irony of this
notion of justified hate is derived from the fact that her message of fighting
for a higher cause that condones any acts of hatred or spreading of darkness
sounds very similar to the Nazis’
justification of their own acts of hatred against others in their pursuit of a
supposed higher cause. Thus Mulisch
illustrates, through the woman’s rather obviously misguided reasoning, that
there can be no justified hate for those claiming to strive towards a higher
cause of light and love. For to achieve
such accomplishments, the means by with they come to pass must represent that
which they stand for. When something great is achieved by means that must be
forgotten in order to keep from marring the image of such an achievement, its supporters become confused by these contradictions within that which they have served loyally and thus experience a loss of identity as the woman in The Assault did. Therefore Mulisch unifies humanity on both sides of the war by drawing parallels between all people in that they justify their hatred and wrongs with a higher cause that will supposedly wash away their sins against fellow man, just as the woman explains away the rebels actions to murder Ploeg and the ramifications it had of indirectly killing Anton's parents all because it was an act against the darkness of the Nazi regime, "for light".
Some excellent attention to detail. Try revising the first sentence; it's super long and confusing.
ReplyDelete